In the News - Candidate Question and Answers

1.      What are your goals and intentions as Kentucky Senator?

My goal as a Kentucky State Senator is to provide steady, thoughtful leadership that reflects the values and priorities of the people I serve. This district is growing, and with that growth comes both opportunity and responsibility. My intention is to ensure we manage that growth in a way that strengthens our communities while preserving what makes them special. That includes protecting our agricultural roots. Having been raised on a farm and continuing to farm today, I understand how important it is to preserve farmland and support the families who depend on it. I will focus on practical, results-driven solutions—supporting strong schools, improving infrastructure, expanding access to healthcare, and maintaining public safety—while protecting local decision-making. I believe leadership means showing up, listening, and doing the work consistently. I will be accessible, prepared, and engaged—someone constituents can trust to represent them well and deliver results.

2.      Why are you the best candidate in this race — not just a qualified one?

There are several qualified individuals in this race, and I respect anyone willing to step forward and serve. What sets me apart is the combination of real-world experience, consistent leadership, and a proven record of delivering results in our community. I’ve spent my career not talking about problems, but solving them. As a healthcare provider and small business owner, I understand firsthand the challenges families, employers, and agricultural producers face—from rising costs to access to care. That perspective matters when making policy decisions that affect people’s daily lives. My time on the Spencer County Board of Education has also shaped how I lead. I’ve worked through growth, budgeting, and long-term planning while keeping students and families at the center of every decision. Those experiences require collaboration, accountability, and a willingness to make tough calls—skills that directly translate to serving in Frankfort. I also bring a steady and disciplined approach. Voters consistently tell me they want someone who is prepared, accessible, and grounded in the community. I take that seriously. Serving in the State Senate requires commitment, follow-through, and a clear focus on results. I’m not running to build a title. I’m running to do the work—thoughtfully, responsibly, and with a focus on the people of this district.

3.      What committees would you want to serve on? Why?

Given my background and the priorities of our district, I would be especially interested in serving on the Health & Welfare, Education, and Agriculture committees. As a healthcare provider, I bring direct, real-world experience to discussions around access, cost, and quality of care—particularly in rural communities. I understand how policy decisions impact both patients and providers, and I will advocate for solutions that are practical, sustainable, and patient-focused. My service on the Spencer County Board of Education has given me firsthand experience in budgeting, facility planning, and supporting student success. As our region grows, ensuring our schools have the resources they need is critical. Agriculture is not just a policy issue for me—it is personal. Having been raised on a farm and continuing to farm today, I understand the pressures facing our agricultural community. I will work to protect farmland, support farmers, and ensure agriculture remains a strong part of our economy and heritage.

4.      What concerns are you hearing from voters, and how will you address them?

Across the district, I’m hearing consistent concerns centered around growth, affordability, and maintaining the quality-of-life people value. Growth is at the top of the list. Families see new development and recognize the opportunities it brings, but they’re also concerned about whether infrastructure, schools, and public services can keep pace. I’m also hearing from farmers and landowners who want to ensure that growth does not come at the expense of our agricultural heritage. My approach is straightforward—growth must be managed responsibly. That means planning ahead, investing wisely in roads and schools, protecting farmland, and ensuring local communities have a strong voice in how development happens. Affordability is another major concern. Whether it is healthcare costs, housing, or everyday expenses, families are feeling the pressure. As a healthcare provider and small business owner, I understand these challenges firsthand. I will support policies that promote economic stability, reduce unnecessary burdens, and create an environment where businesses, farms, and families can succeed. Access to healthcare—especially in rural areas—is also a priority issue. Patients want timely, reliable care close to home. I will work to strengthen provider networks, protect essential programs, and ensure accountability so resources are used effectively. Finally, voters want transparency and accessibility from their elected officials. They want someone who listens and follows through. I am committed to being present, responsive, and engaged with the people I represent. Addressing these concerns requires more than promises—it requires consistent effort, thoughtful decision-making, and a willingness to deliver real results for the entire district.

5.      Do you support continuing Kentucky’s income tax reduction efforts? Why or why not?

I support efforts to make Kentucky’s tax system more competitive and to provide relief to hardworking families, but those efforts must be balanced with responsible budgeting and long-term stability. Reducing the income tax can help attract businesses, encourage investment, and allow individuals to keep more of what they earn. Those are important goals, especially as our region continues to grow and compete with neighboring states. However, tax policy should never be considered in isolation. We must ensure that reductions are sustainable and do not come at the expense of essential services like education, infrastructure, public safety, and support for rural and agricultural communities. Growth and fiscal responsibility must go hand in hand. I believe the right approach is a measured one—continuing to evaluate reductions carefully based on economic performance and revenue stability. If the state is in a strong financial position, it makes sense to consider additional steps, but those decisions should always be grounded in data and long-term planning. My focus will be on maintaining a balanced approach: supporting policies that encourage growth and opportunity while ensuring we meet our obligations and invest in the future of our communities.